Welcome to Medivizor!

You're browsing our sample library. Feel free to continue browsing. You can also sign up for free to receive medical information specific to your situation.

Posted by on Jan 5, 2017 in Hodgkin's lymphoma | 0 comments

In a nutshell

This trial compared the outcomes of ABVD and Stanford-V chemotherapy in patients with stage I or stage II bulky Hodgkin lymphoma. The authors concluded that both treatments were equally effective.

Some background

Hodgkin Lymphoma is a cancer of the lymph system. Patients with bulky disease have tumors larger than 10 cm. 20-25% of Hodgkin lymphoma patients have bulky disease in the chest area. The most common treatment for Stage I or Stage II bulky disease is ABVD chemotherapy (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine). This is followed by radiation therapy.

Stanford-V chemotherapy (mechlorethamine, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, vinblastine, etoposide, and prednisone) is another combination used with radiation therapy. Stanford-V treatment results in less overall exposure to anthracyclines (such as doxorubicinand bleomycin than does ABVD chemotherapy. It is not clear whether this treatment is as effective as ABVD chemotherapy in early-stage patients with bulky disease.

Methods & findings

This trial compared ABVD and Stanford-V chemotherapy in early-stage, bulky-disease patients.

264 patients with stage I or stage II bulky disease were included. All patients were previously untreated135 were treated with 6–8 cycles of ABVD chemotherapy (group A). 129 were treated with Stanford V chemotherapy once a week for twelve weeks (group S). Both groups were treated with radiation 2–3 weeks after the end of chemotherapy. Stanford-V patients also received further radiotherapy to their large (i.e. greater-than-5cm) tumors. Patients were followed for an average of 6.5 years. 

83% of group A patients and 88% of group S patients saw a response to treatment (such as tumor shrinkage). At five years, there were no significant differences in failure-free survival (time from treatment until disease progression, relapse or death), overall survival (time rom treatment until death from any cause) and risk of second cancers between groups. Less than 10% of patients relapsed overall.

Group S patients had higher rates of short-term side effects. 83% of group S had low levels of lymphocytes (a type of white blood cell), compared to 46% of group A. 7% of group S experienced nerve pain compared to 1% of group A.

The bottom line

This study concluded that both ABVD and Stanford-V chemotherapies were effective for early-stage, bulky-disease patients.

The fine print

The patients need to be followed-up for longer periods. This study also used CT scans instead of PET scans to examine chemotherapy response.
 

What’s next?

Discuss with your physician which treatment would be better for you.
Published By :

Journal of clinical oncology

Date :

Jun 10, 2015

Original Title :

Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing ABVD Plus Radiotherapy With the Stanford V Regimen in Patients With Stages I or II Locally Extensive, Bulky Mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Subset Analysis of the North American Intergroup E2496 Trial.

click here to get personalized updates