Welcome to Medivizor!

You're browsing our sample library. Feel free to continue browsing. You can also sign up for free to receive medical information specific to your situation.

Posted by on Jan 6, 2017 in Hodgkin's lymphoma | 0 comments

In a nutshell

This study investigated whether end-of-treatment PET scans could be left out if the mid-treatment scans were negative (no cancer activity). The authors concluded that the end-of-treatment scans were essential, even in patients with negative interim results.

Some background

Positron emission tomograpy (PET) scans are used to assess cancer severity. Patients with Hodgkin lymphoma generally undero PET scans at the start, middle and end of treatment. Studies have shown that interim (middle) scans can predict patient outcome. This questions whether end-of-treatment scans are needed. Lowering the number of scans needed may reduce a patient's radiation exposure.

Methods & findings

This study aimed to determine whether end-of-treatment scans were necessary.

This study examined the interim and end-of-treatment scans of 76 patients. All were treated with 3-8 cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) chemotherapyNo patient had their treatment changed based on their interim-scan score. Patients were followed for an average of 58.9 months.

Treatment failure occurred in 20% of patients. End-of-treatment scans predicted 80% of treatment failures. Interim scans predicted 47% of treatment failures. 

Results varied depending on whether the results from both types of scans were negative (no cancer activity) or positive (a small amount of cancer activity). After 5 years, 87% of patients with negative interim scans were disease progression free compared to 56% of those with positive scans. 96% of patients with negative end-of-treatment scans were progression free compared to 23% of those with positive scans. The cancer was 24.02-fold more likely to relapse if end-of-treatment scans were positive. This is compared to a 3.79-fold increased likelihood for positive interim scans.

The bottom line

The authors concluded that end-of-treatment PET scans were important, even in patients with negative interim scans.

The fine print

This study used different methods for interpreting interim and end-of-treatment scans. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

What’s next?

Discuss the timing and importance of PET scans with your doctor.

Published By :

British Journal of Haematology

Date :

Nov 01, 2016

Original Title :

Hodgkin lymphoma: a negative interim-PET cannot circumvent the need for end-of-treatment-PET evaluation.

click here to get personalized updates