Welcome to Medivizor!

You're browsing our sample library. Feel free to continue browsing. You can also sign up for free to receive medical information specific to your situation.

Posted by on Jul 26, 2020 in Prostate cancer | 0 comments

In a nutshell

The study compared outcomes of apalutamide (A; Erleada), darolutamide (D; Nubeqa), and enzalutamide (E; Xtandi) in treating nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). The authors found that A and E had better metastasis-free survival (MFS) compared to D.

Some background

Men with CRPC fail to respond to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). ADT blocks the male hormone testosterone and prevents PC cells’ growth. NmCRPC is cancer that has not yet spread to distant organs or tissues. It commonly becomes metastatic within 5 years. A, D, and E delayed metastasis and improved MFS in clinical trials. MFS means how long patients survive without metastasis after treatment initiation. However, comparisons between the effectiveness of these 3 drugs are lacking.

Methods & findings

The authors extracted data from 3 trials reporting effects of A, D, and E on a total 4117 patients with nmCRPC. Patients had received either of A/D/E or placebo (a drug with no effects).

Patients on placebo had 68% higher chances of metastasis compared to the A/D/E group. Patients on D had a 27% higher risk of metastasis compared to A and a 29% higher risk compared to E. Both A and E groups had similar risks of metastasis.

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a protein made by the prostate gland. Progression or increase in PSA levels indicates advance in PC. Patients on D had a 54% higher risk of PSA progression compared to A and a 46% higher risk compared to E. Both A and E groups had similar PSA progression rates.

No differences in overall survival were seen between the A, E, and D groups.

The bottom line

The study concluded that survival without metastasis was similar between A and E, but higher compared to D in treating patients with nmCRPC. 

The fine print

This study was a meta-analysis, meaning that it compiled and reanalyzed data from multiple trials. The drugs were not compared directly. Further controlled studies are needed to evaluate the compared effectiveness of the 3 drugs.

Published By :

Urologic oncology

Date :

Jun 28, 2020

Original Title :

Comparative efficacy of apalutamidedarolutamide and enzalutamidefor treatment of nonmetastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: Asystematic review and network meta-analysis.

click here to get personalized updates