Welcome to Medivizor!

You're browsing our sample library. Feel free to continue browsing. You can also sign up for free to receive medical information specific to your situation.

Posted by on Aug 24, 2019 in Coronary artery disease | 0 comments

In a nutshell

This study compared the long-term outcomes of different coronary angioplasty procedures in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). The authors found that staged CA was better at reducing the risk of complications compared to culprit CA.

Some background

CHD is caused by the narrowing of blood vessels that supply the heart (coronary arteries). This can lead to complications, including heart attacks. CHD is often treated with a procedure called coronary angioplasty (CA). In this procedure, a small tube is inserted into the affected blood vessel to help widen it.

There are two types of CA procedures. Culprit CA is done in the affected blood vessel only. Staged CA is done in the affected blood vessel and surrounding blood vessels, so it requires more surgery than culprit CA. The long-term outcomes of staged CA versus culprit CA in patients with CHD remain under investigation.

Methods & findings

This study included the medical records of 1,205 patients with CHD who received a CA procedure. 629 patients had culprit CA, and 576 patients had staged CA. Patients were followed-up for an average of 5.01 years. Long-term complications were evaluated, including heart attack, stroke, any additional CA procedures, and mortality due to CHD.

Overall, patients who had staged CA had a 28% lower risk of long-term complications compared to patients who had culprit CA. Patients who received staged CA had a 48% lower risk of a heart attack and a 26% lower risk of needing more CA procedures. 

Staged CA was significantly associated with lower risks for heart attack (51%) and needing more CA procedures (33%). However, patients with diabetes who received staged CA had similar risks of these complications compared to patients who had culprit CA.

The bottom line

This study concluded that staged CA is better at preventing long-term complications of CHD than culprit CA. However, patients with diabetes did not experience this reduced risk. The authors suggest that more studies are needed for these patients.

The fine print

This study analyzed medical records retrospectively. Also, this study involved Chinese patients only, so these results may not apply to all patients. During the study period, CA technology and medications were updated. More studies are needed to confirm these results.

What’s next?

Talk to your doctor about the advantages and risks of coronary angioplasty.

Published By :

The American journal of cardiology

Date :

Aug 01, 2019

Original Title :

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease.

click here to get personalized updates