Welcome to Medivizor!

You're browsing our sample library. Feel free to continue browsing. You can also sign up for free to receive medical information specific to your situation.

Posted by on Mar 14, 2013 in Colorectal cancer | 0 comments

In a nutshell

The present study compared outcomes of two treatment methods for patients with malignant colorectal polyps (MCP): endoscopic versus surgical management.

Some background

Most colorectal cancers develop from a malignant (cancerous) polyp, an abnormal growth on the inner surface of the large intestine. When a polyp is found, the only way to know if it is cancerous or not is to remove it completely or part of it (biopsy) and to have it analyzed by a pathologist. Removal of a polyp can be done either surgically, by removing the section of the colon which contains the polyp (colectomy), or during a colonoscopy (endoscopy), by cutting the polyp (polypectomy). A colonoscopy is a procedure doctors use to look inside the large intestine using a thin flexible tube with a camera (colonoscope). A MCP is considered stage I colorectal cancer, thus management of these lesions need careful analysis and patients must be closely monitored. 

Methods & findings

The present study included 386 patients with MCP. 165 patients (42.7%) were diagnosed through a biopsy, with no attempt to remove the polyp and 221 patients (57.3%) were diagnosed when the polyp was removed during a colonoscopy. All the patients diagnosed via biopsy had surgery to remove the MCP thereafter. Out of the patients managed endoscopically, 103 (46.6%) received follow-up surgery, of whom 76.7% had no residual cancer. Of the remaining 118 patients (53.4%) in the endoscopy group, none (100%) had residual cancer on follow-up colonoscopy. There was no significant difference among overall survival (defined as the percentage of patients who have survived for a certain period of time) after surgical or endoscopic management of MCP. 

The bottom line

In summary, endoscopic management appears to be safe and effective in a selected group of patients with MCP, with survival outcomes comparable with patients treated surgically. 

The fine print

The study had a short follow up period (approximately 2 years) which might be insufficient to determine the recurrence (return of the cancer) rate. Also, the study looks back at patients who have been treated in the past (retrospective study) rather than following the patients throughout their treatment and determining their outcomes (prospective study). Retrospective studies are considered to provide weak statistical evidence.

Published By :

Colorectal Disease

Date :

Jun 18, 2012

Original Title :

Management and short-term outcome of malignant colorectal polyps in the north of England

click here to get personalized updates